Patagonia, the new local economy, and fabric recycling

Yesterday I took the day off. Yes, in the middle of the week, unusual. I drove to Boulder and took an easy hike in Chautauqua Park at the Flatirons base, my first hike since the cycling injury. After lunch, I strolled along Pearl Street and stopped into the Patagonia store. One of the first things to catch my eye was the book let my people go surfing: the education of a reluctant businessman by Patagonia founder Yvon Chouinard. 

In the Preface, Yvon lays out new directions for Patagonia brought on through reflections on sustainability:

At Patagonia we have started to prepare for what we think will become a more locally based economy. A global economy based on cheap transportation is not sustainable. Our present mode of production includes buying organic cotton in Turkey, shipping the bales to Thailand to be processed into fabric, shipping the fabric to Texas to be cut, to Mexico to be sewn, on to our warehouse in Reno, then to our stores and dealers, and finally to our customers' homes.

The retail price of regular gas 10 years ago (May 8, 2001) was $1.427 per gallon. Today it is $3.963. If petroleum prices continue to increase at same rate over the next couple of decades, it wont be sustainable at all.

Another direction for Patagonia is to "start making all clothing from recycled and recyclable fibers." This is a dramatic change, one that will likely take years, and may never fully materialize. But for a company already a leader in sustainability, it signals a new direction that other companies will likely emulate. Beginning with the Common Threads Recycling Program:

We seek to close the manufacturing and consumption loop in the way the modern aluminum industry works. We'll collect from our customers their worn out polyester garments and send them back to Teijin for recycling into new polyester fiber. ...With the extra shipping, the program still yields energy savings of 76% and reduction in greenhouse-gas (CO2) emissions of 71 percent, compared to the creation of polyester fiber from new, petroleum based raw material.

Those savings are sure to generate interest among competitors. However, as always, customer choices drive the market.  

Related entries:

Numbers: Water and blue jeans

Jeans made with less water

Numbers: Water and blue jeans

3,500
The number of liters of water a pair of jeans uses over its lifetime

180
The number of office coolers it takes to hold 3,500 liters of water

42
The number of liters of water an average pair of jeans uses for finishing

Source: Your pants are an eco-abomination—here’s how to lessen their impact
Related Entry: Jeans made with less water

Jeans made with less water

Looking for a new pair of jeans? Want to save water?  In January 2011, Levi Strauss will introduce a line of Levi's® brand jeans that requires much less water to manufacture. According to the company's website:

The Levi's® brand today announced its new Water<Less jeans – made using significantly less water. The average pair of jeans uses 42 litres of water in the finishing process. The Water<Less collection reduces the water consumption by an average of 28% and up to 96% for some new products in the line.

Not interested in saving water? Then try this on from Sustaining Life:

Despite the fact that rivers, lakes, and wetlands cover less than 1 percent of the Earth’s surface and hold only about 0.01 percent of its water, they harbor extraordinary concentrations of biodiversity.

… as much as one-third of all vertebrate species are confined to freshwater habitats.

Freshwater habitats are among the most endangered in the world, and decline of freshwater biodiversity outpaces that in both terrestrial and marine systems.

Or, maybe you are one of the “30 million people in seven US states and Mexico” dependent on the dwindling Colorado River. Or, you live in one of the top ten U.S. cities running out of water.

If you are in the market for a pair of jeans next year, buy used. If you are buying new, these may just work for you.