insulin

Elevated blood glucose impairs memory

A study published online in Neurology on October 23, 2013 sheds light on the possible mechanisms of dementia in persons with elevated blood glucose but without diabetes as discussed in the previous post. The hippocampus, located in the inner aspect of both temporal lobes, is the key brain structure for memory consolidation and storage.

The researchers “aimed to elucidate whether higher glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glucose levels exert a negative impact on memory performance and hippocampal volume and microstructure in a cohort of healthy, older, nondiabetic individuals without dementia.”

Learning tests, blood levels of HbA1c, glucose, and insulin, and advanced (3-tesla) MRI scans were performed on 141 persons  (72 women & 69 men) with an average age of 63. Those with lower glucose and HbA1c levels had better learning and memory and a healthier hippocampi:

“Lower HbA1c and glucose levels were significantly associated with better scores in delayed recall, learning ability, and memory consolidation. …Moreover, mediation analyses indicated that beneficial effects of lower HbA1c on memory are in part mediated by hippocampal volume and microstructure.”

The authors concluded:

“Our results indicate that even in the absence of manifest type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance, chronically higher blood glucose levels exert a negative influence on cognition, possibly mediated by structural changes in learning-relevant brain areas. Therefore, strategies aimed at lowering glucose levels even in the normal range may beneficially influence cognition in the older population, a hypothesis to be examined in future interventional trials.

Source:  Higher glucose levels associated with lower memory and reduced hippocampal microstructure 

Related Post:  Even mild elevations in blood sugar increase risk of dementia

MDA Success Story: Impact of Paleo nutrition on Shawn's Type I diabetes

From Mark's Daily Apple comes another great success story:

PIC3 2.jpg
Around January of this year a friend exposed me to the paleo diet. I checked it out and was intrigued. I started doing extensive reading and research (during which I came across this website) and decided to give it a try. I slowly started purging out the sugars/carbs/processed foods that were poisoning my body (especially cereal which was a staple of my diet at the time), and whaddya know…my blood sugars and overall health improved drastically, and my insulin requirements dropped like a rock!!!

Read more here.

Getting fatter on the typical Western diet

obesity.jpeg

Image: Newsweek magazineGary Taubes, an Investigator in Health Policy Research at the Berkley School of Public Health, has been battling conventional wisdom regarding nutrition for years. He has delivered his message in many forums including the 2007 book, Good Calories, Bad Calories and the 2011 book, Why We Get Fat.

His most recent contribution is an article in the May 14 print issue of Newsweek: The New Obesity Campaigns Have It All Wrong. Taubes notes that conventional wisdom regarding the cause of obesity is based on the concept of “energy balance”:

At its heart is a simple “energy balance” idea: we get fat because we consume too many calories and expend too few. If we could just control our impulses – or at least control our environment, thereby removing temptation – and push ourselves to exercise, we’d be fine. This logic is everywhere…”

Unfortunately, the "energy balance" concept is failing us: 42% of American will be fat by 2030. Even NIH Director Francis Collins has difficulty explaining the failure - “We are struggling to figure this out.” Taubes has another view:

There is an alternative theory, one that has also been around for decades but that the establishment has largely ignored. This theory implicates specific foods – refined sugars and grains – because of their effect on the hormone insulin, which regulates fat accumulation. If this hormonal-defect hypothesis is true, not all calories are created equal, as the conventional wisdom holds. And if it is true, the problem is not only controlling our impulses, but also changing the entire American food economy and rewriting our beliefs about what constitutes a healthy diet. (emphasis added)

Related Posts